18 August 2007

My friends are better than your friends?

At first the idea of challenging your friends to a game of Trumps appealed to me. A "My friends are better than yours", "no they're not", "let's prove it!" scenario. This would clearly have some humourous appeal and capture the imagination, however there is tension between this goal, the actual game "Trumps", technical possibilities and the requirements of internet privacy.

Playing Trumps "head to head", so far as I can reason, would require the following:
  1. Player 1 and Player 2 each have a different set of card representing respective friends.
  2. The game would need to be remotely multiplayer.

Just these two things are massively problematic. If Player 1 trumps Player 2, then does Player 1 "gain" that friend from Player 2? Player 1 could then cycle through their entire stack and trump Player 2 with one of Player 2's own cards! Completely undermines the "my friends better" principle.

What about privacy! Where Player 1 is playing a card who Player 2 is not friends with, or worse has blocked, you are revealing statistics derived from the private part of that friends profile. While the statistics are not going to be greatly revealing this goes against an important principle and most likely breaches the terms of the Facebook API.

If you were going to challenge someone to a game of "My friends are better than yours" you would want to play live. I will have more to say on this in the future, but the kind of asychoronous messaging system involved in this are beyond what my webhost can provide at present (I would probably need to use Jetty http://www.mortbay.org/ rather than Tomcat, otherwise I would need 1 thread per connection and likely the limited resources provided by my webhost would crash under load). At least for the first iteration of the game I want to play vs. a CPU.

Labels: , , , ,